diff -r 000000000000 -r 419d959441ed patches/gcc/3.4.1/gcc-3.4-sparc-pr16430-fix.patch --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/patches/gcc/3.4.1/gcc-3.4-sparc-pr16430-fix.patch Tue Aug 14 19:32:22 2007 +0000 @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +Message-ID: <33159.207.230.144.240.1093980498.squirrel@207.230.144.240> +Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:28:18 -0500 (CDT) +Subject: Crosstool 0.28-rc35 +From: "Jason Rothstein" +To: dank@kegel.com + +Could you please add the patches in GCC PR 16430 to GCC 3.4.1? + +http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16430 + +These fix one of 2 current ICE conditions when building a sparc64 ada +compilers. + + +http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-3_4-branch&r1=1.271.4.16&r2=1.271.4.17 + +=================================================================== +RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c,v +retrieving revision 1.271.4.16 +retrieving revision 1.271.4.17 +diff -u -r1.271.4.16 -r1.271.4.17 +--- gcc/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c 2004/07/08 13:00:56 1.271.4.16 ++++ gcc/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c 2004/07/08 14:36:51 1.271.4.17 +@@ -5808,6 +5808,18 @@ + abort (); + + mode = mode_for_size (bytes * BITS_PER_UNIT, MODE_INT, 0); ++ ++ /* ??? We probably should have made the same ABI change in ++ 3.4.0 as the one we made for unions. The latter was ++ required by the SCD though, while the former is not ++ specified, so we favored compatibility and efficiency. ++ ++ Now we're stuck for aggregates larger than 16 bytes, ++ because OImode vanished in the meantime. Let's not ++ try to be unduly clever, and simply follow the ABI ++ for unions in that case. */ ++ if (mode == BLKmode) ++ return function_arg_union_value (bytes, mode, regbase); + } + else if (GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_INT + && GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) < UNITS_PER_WORD)