diff -r 419d959441ed -r 447b203edc2e patches/gcc/3.3.1/pr10392-1-test.patch
--- a/patches/gcc/3.3.1/pr10392-1-test.patch	Tue Aug 14 19:32:22 2007 +0000
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
---- /dev/null	Sat Dec 14 13:56:51 2002
-+++ gcc-3.3.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr10392-1.c	Sun Sep 14 14:28:24 2003
-@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
-+/* PR optimization/10392
-+ * Reporter: marcus@mc.pp.se
-+ * Summary: [3.3/3.4 regression] [SH] optimizer generates faulty array indexing
-+ * Description:
-+ * The address calculation of an index operation on an array on the stack 
-+ * can _under some conditions_ get messed up completely
-+ *
-+ * Testcase tweaked by dank@kegel.com
-+ * Problem only happens with -O2 -m4, so it should only happen on sh4,
-+ * but what the heck, let's test other architectures, too.
-+ * Not marked as xfail since it's a regression.
-+*/
-+/* { dg-do run } */
-+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
-+/* { dg-options "-O2 -m4" { target sh4-*-* } } */
-+const char *dont_optimize_function_away;
-+
-+const char *use(const char *str)
-+{
-+	dont_optimize_function_away = str;
-+	if (str[0] != 'v')
-+		abort();
-+	if (str[1] < '1' || str[1] > '6')
-+		abort();
-+	if (str[2])
-+		abort();
-+	return str[2] ? "notused" : "v6";
-+}
-+
-+const char *func(char *a, char *b)
-+{
-+	char buf[128];
-+	unsigned char i;
-+	const char *result;
-+
-+	char *item[] = {
-+		"v1",
-+		"v2",
-+	};
-+
-+	buf[0] = 'v';
-+	buf[1] = '3';
-+	buf[2] = 0;
-+
-+	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
-+		/* bug is: following line passes wild pointer to use() on sh4 -O2 */
-+		result = use(item[i]);
-+
-+		use(buf);
-+		use(a);
-+		use(b);
-+		result = use(result);
-+	}
-+	return result;
-+}
-+
-+int main()
-+{
-+	func("v4", "v5");
-+	return 0;
-+}
-+