diff -r 419d959441ed -r 447b203edc2e patches/gcc/3.3.1/pr10412-1-test.patch
--- a/patches/gcc/3.3.1/pr10412-1-test.patch	Tue Aug 14 19:32:22 2007 +0000
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
---- /dev/null	Sat Dec 14 13:56:51 2002
-+++ gcc-3.3.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr10412-1.c	Sun Sep 14 16:15:21 2003
-@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
-+/* PR target/10412
-+ * Reporter: shrinivasa@kpitcummins.com 
-+ * Summary: Renesas SH - Incorrect code generation
-+ * Description:
-+ * When following code is compiled  with
-+ * sh-elf-gcc  -S -mhitachi -m2 -O2 bug1.c
-+ * generates an incorrect code.
-+ *
-+ * Testcase tweaked by dank@kegel.com
-+ * Problem only happens with -mhitachi -m2.  Not sure if I can give those
-+ * options for all sh targets.  They work on sh4, though.
-+ * Not marked as xfail as it's a regression relative to hardhat 2.0 gcc-2.97.
-+*/
-+/* { dg-do run } */
-+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
-+int global_val;
-+
-+int func0(int x)
-+{
-+	global_val += x;
-+	return (x != 99);
-+}
-+
-+int func1(unsigned long addr)
-+{
-+	int err;
-+
-+	err = func0(addr);
-+	if (err)
-+		return (err);
-+
-+	err = func0(addr * 7);	/* address of func0 is lost during multiplication -> probable SIGSEGV */
-+	return (err);
-+}
-+
-+int main(int argc, char **argv)
-+{
-+	global_val = 0;
-+	global_val += func1(99);
-+	if (global_val != 99 * 8 + 1)
-+		abort();
-+	return 0;
-+}