diff -r 35b30f8fb307 -r 5dd0b83ae528 patches/gcc/4.3.5/160-flatten-switch-stmt-00.patch
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/patches/gcc/4.3.5/160-flatten-switch-stmt-00.patch	Sun Sep 19 18:37:18 2010 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+Original patch from: ../4.3.2/160-flatten-switch-stmt-00.patch
+
+-= BEGIN original header =-
+Original patch from gentoo: gentoo/src/patchsets/gcc/4.3.1/gentoo/18_all_904-flatten-switch-stmt-00.patch
+http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00927.html
+
+Hi,
+
+The attached patch makes sure that we create smaller object code for
+simple switch statements. We just make sure to flatten the switch
+statement into an if-else chain, basically.
+
+This fixes a size-regression as compared to gcc-3.4, as can be seen
+below.
+
+2007-04-15  Bernhard Fischer  <..>
+
+	* stmt.c (expand_case): Do not create a complex binary tree when
+	optimizing for size but rather use the simple ordered list.
+	(emit_case_nodes): do not emit jumps to the default_label when
+	optimizing for size.
+
+Not regtested so far.
+Comments?
+
+Attached is the test switch.c mentioned below.
+
+$ for i in 2.95 3.3 3.4 4.0 4.1 4.2.orig-HEAD 4.3.orig-HEAD 4.3-HEAD;do
+gcc-$i  -DCHAIN -Os -o switch-CHAIN-$i.o -c switch.c ;done
+$ for i in 2.95 3.3 3.4 4.0 4.1 4.2.orig-HEAD 4.3.orig-HEAD 4.3-HEAD;do
+gcc-$i  -UCHAIN -Os -o switch-$i.o -c switch.c ;done
+
+$ size switch-*.o
+   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
+    169	      0	      0	    169	     a9	switch-2.95.o
+    115	      0	      0	    115	     73	switch-3.3.o
+    103	      0	      0	    103	     67	switch-3.4.o
+    124	      0	      0	    124	     7c	switch-4.0.o
+    124	      0	      0	    124	     7c	switch-4.1.o
+    124	      0	      0	    124	     7c	switch-4.2.orig-HEAD.o
+     95	      0	      0	     95	     5f	switch-4.3-HEAD.o
+    124	      0	      0	    124	     7c	switch-4.3.orig-HEAD.o
+    166	      0	      0	    166	     a6	switch-CHAIN-2.95.o
+    111	      0	      0	    111	     6f	switch-CHAIN-3.3.o
+     95	      0	      0	     95	     5f	switch-CHAIN-3.4.o
+     95	      0	      0	     95	     5f	switch-CHAIN-4.0.o
+     95	      0	      0	     95	     5f	switch-CHAIN-4.1.o
+     95	      0	      0	     95	     5f	switch-CHAIN-4.2.orig-HEAD.o
+     95	      0	      0	     95	     5f	switch-CHAIN-4.3-HEAD.o
+     95	      0	      0	     95	     5f	switch-CHAIN-4.3.orig-HEAD.o
+
+
+Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii
+Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="gcc-4.3.gcc-flatten-switch-stmt.00.diff"
+
+-= END original header =-
+
+diff -durN gcc-4.3.3.orig/gcc/stmt.c gcc-4.3.3/gcc/stmt.c
+--- gcc-4.3.3.orig/gcc/stmt.c	2008-05-09 20:12:13.000000000 +0200
++++ gcc-4.3.3/gcc/stmt.c	2009-01-27 22:19:28.000000000 +0100
+@@ -2509,7 +2509,11 @@
+ 	  use_cost_table
+ 	    = (TREE_CODE (orig_type) != ENUMERAL_TYPE
+ 	       && estimate_case_costs (case_list));
+-	  balance_case_nodes (&case_list, NULL);
++	  /* When optimizing for size, we want a straight list to avoid
++	     jumps as much as possible. This basically creates an if-else
++	     chain.  */
++	  if (!optimize_size)
++	    balance_case_nodes (&case_list, NULL);
+ 	  emit_case_nodes (index, case_list, default_label, index_type);
+ 	  emit_jump (default_label);
+ 	}
+@@ -3067,6 +3071,7 @@
+ 	    {
+ 	      if (!node_has_low_bound (node, index_type))
+ 		{
++		  if (!optimize_size) /* don't jl to the .default_label. */
+ 		  emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (index,
+ 					   convert_modes
+ 					   (mode, imode,