diff -r 9d1c1b6af205 -r 708c0b301c7b patches/gcc/4.3.0/160-flatten-switch-stmt-00.patch
--- a/patches/gcc/4.3.0/160-flatten-switch-stmt-00.patch	Sun Jan 31 12:22:54 2010 +0100
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,76 +0,0 @@
-Original patch from gentoo: gentoo/src/patchsets/gcc/4.3.0/gentoo/18_all_904-flatten-switch-stmt-00.patch
-http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00927.html
-
-Hi,
-
-The attached patch makes sure that we create smaller object code for
-simple switch statements. We just make sure to flatten the switch
-statement into an if-else chain, basically.
-
-This fixes a size-regression as compared to gcc-3.4, as can be seen
-below.
-
-2007-04-15  Bernhard Fischer  <..>
-
-	* stmt.c (expand_case): Do not create a complex binary tree when
-	optimizing for size but rather use the simple ordered list.
-	(emit_case_nodes): do not emit jumps to the default_label when
-	optimizing for size.
-
-Not regtested so far.
-Comments?
-
-Attached is the test switch.c mentioned below.
-
-$ for i in 2.95 3.3 3.4 4.0 4.1 4.2.orig-HEAD 4.3.orig-HEAD 4.3-HEAD;do
-gcc-$i  -DCHAIN -Os -o switch-CHAIN-$i.o -c switch.c ;done
-$ for i in 2.95 3.3 3.4 4.0 4.1 4.2.orig-HEAD 4.3.orig-HEAD 4.3-HEAD;do
-gcc-$i  -UCHAIN -Os -o switch-$i.o -c switch.c ;done
-
-$ size switch-*.o
-   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
-    169	      0	      0	    169	     a9	switch-2.95.o
-    115	      0	      0	    115	     73	switch-3.3.o
-    103	      0	      0	    103	     67	switch-3.4.o
-    124	      0	      0	    124	     7c	switch-4.0.o
-    124	      0	      0	    124	     7c	switch-4.1.o
-    124	      0	      0	    124	     7c	switch-4.2.orig-HEAD.o
-     95	      0	      0	     95	     5f	switch-4.3-HEAD.o
-    124	      0	      0	    124	     7c	switch-4.3.orig-HEAD.o
-    166	      0	      0	    166	     a6	switch-CHAIN-2.95.o
-    111	      0	      0	    111	     6f	switch-CHAIN-3.3.o
-     95	      0	      0	     95	     5f	switch-CHAIN-3.4.o
-     95	      0	      0	     95	     5f	switch-CHAIN-4.0.o
-     95	      0	      0	     95	     5f	switch-CHAIN-4.1.o
-     95	      0	      0	     95	     5f	switch-CHAIN-4.2.orig-HEAD.o
-     95	      0	      0	     95	     5f	switch-CHAIN-4.3-HEAD.o
-     95	      0	      0	     95	     5f	switch-CHAIN-4.3.orig-HEAD.o
-
-
-Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii
-Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="gcc-4.3.gcc-flatten-switch-stmt.00.diff"
-
-diff -durN gcc-4.3.0.orig/gcc/stmt.c gcc-4.3.0/gcc/stmt.c
---- gcc-4.3.0.orig/gcc/stmt.c	2007-12-04 22:55:32.000000000 +0100
-+++ gcc-4.3.0/gcc/stmt.c	2008-06-10 14:44:33.000000000 +0200
-@@ -2508,7 +2508,11 @@
- 	  use_cost_table
- 	    = (TREE_CODE (orig_type) != ENUMERAL_TYPE
- 	       && estimate_case_costs (case_list));
--	  balance_case_nodes (&case_list, NULL);
-+	  /* When optimizing for size, we want a straight list to avoid
-+	     jumps as much as possible. This basically creates an if-else
-+	     chain.  */
-+	  if (!optimize_size)
-+	    balance_case_nodes (&case_list, NULL);
- 	  emit_case_nodes (index, case_list, default_label, index_type);
- 	  emit_jump (default_label);
- 	}
-@@ -3066,6 +3070,7 @@
- 	    {
- 	      if (!node_has_low_bound (node, index_type))
- 		{
-+		  if (!optimize_size) /* don't jl to the .default_label. */
- 		  emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (index,
- 					   convert_modes
- 					   (mode, imode,