diff -r 000000000000 -r eeea35fbf182 patches/gcc/3.3.3/pr10392-1-test.patch
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/patches/gcc/3.3.3/pr10392-1-test.patch	Sat Feb 24 11:00:05 2007 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+--- /dev/null	Sat Dec 14 13:56:51 2002
++++ gcc-3.3.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr10392-1.c	Sun Sep 14 14:28:24 2003
+@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
++/* PR optimization/10392
++ * Reporter: marcus@mc.pp.se
++ * Summary: [3.3/3.4 regression] [SH] optimizer generates faulty array indexing
++ * Description:
++ * The address calculation of an index operation on an array on the stack 
++ * can _under some conditions_ get messed up completely
++ *
++ * Testcase tweaked by dank@kegel.com
++ * Problem only happens with -O2 -m4, so it should only happen on sh4,
++ * but what the heck, let's test other architectures, too.
++ * Not marked as xfail since it's a regression.
++*/
++/* { dg-do run } */
++/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
++/* { dg-options "-O2 -m4" { target sh4-*-* } } */
++const char *dont_optimize_function_away;
++
++const char *use(const char *str)
++{
++	dont_optimize_function_away = str;
++	if (str[0] != 'v')
++		abort();
++	if (str[1] < '1' || str[1] > '6')
++		abort();
++	if (str[2])
++		abort();
++	return str[2] ? "notused" : "v6";
++}
++
++const char *func(char *a, char *b)
++{
++	char buf[128];
++	unsigned char i;
++	const char *result;
++
++	char *item[] = {
++		"v1",
++		"v2",
++	};
++
++	buf[0] = 'v';
++	buf[1] = '3';
++	buf[2] = 0;
++
++	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
++		/* bug is: following line passes wild pointer to use() on sh4 -O2 */
++		result = use(item[i]);
++
++		use(buf);
++		use(a);
++		use(b);
++		result = use(result);
++	}
++	return result;
++}
++
++int main()
++{
++	func("v4", "v5");
++	return 0;
++}
++