diff options
| author |   Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> | 2007-02-24 11:00:05 (GMT) |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> | 2007-02-24 11:00:05 (GMT) |
| commit | 1906cf93f86d8d66f45f90380a8d3da25c087ee5 (patch) | |
| tree | 90916c99abe1f1ec26709ee420e6c349eda4670a /patches/binutils/2.14.90.0.5 | |
| parent | 2609573aede4ce198b3462976725b25eb1637d2e (diff) | |
Add the full crosstool-NG sources to the new repository of its own.
You might just say: 'Yeah! crosstool-NG's got its own repo!".
Unfortunately, that's because the previous repo got damaged beyond repair and I had no backup.
That means I'm putting backups in place in the afternoon.
That also means we've lost history... :-(
Diffstat (limited to 'patches/binutils/2.14.90.0.5')
| -rw-r--r-- | patches/binutils/2.14.90.0.5/binutils-cross-demangler.patch | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | patches/binutils/2.14.90.0.5/binutils-sh-relocs.patch | 38 |
2 files changed, 49 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/patches/binutils/2.14.90.0.5/binutils-cross-demangler.patch b/patches/binutils/2.14.90.0.5/binutils-cross-demangler.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ec701ce --- /dev/null +++ b/patches/binutils/2.14.90.0.5/binutils-cross-demangler.patch @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +--- orig/Makefile.in 2004-05-12 18:22:30.000000000 -0700 ++++ binutils-2.14.90.0.5/Makefile.in 2004-05-12 18:26:19.000000000 -0700 +@@ -24384,6 +24384,8 @@ + # Demangler depends on libiberty. + configure-demangler: maybe-configure-libiberty + all-demangler: maybe-all-libiberty ++configure-build-demangler: maybe-configure-build-libiberty ++all-build-demangler: maybe-all-build-libiberty + + # The new demangler, which is included in libiberty, is written in C++. + # A working C++ compiler is required. For the target demangler, it may diff --git a/patches/binutils/2.14.90.0.5/binutils-sh-relocs.patch b/patches/binutils/2.14.90.0.5/binutils-sh-relocs.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ca0f2ac --- /dev/null +++ b/patches/binutils/2.14.90.0.5/binutils-sh-relocs.patch @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +Message-Id: <200307311239.h6VCdNe27056@r-rr.iij4u.or.jp> +To: dank@kegel.com +Cc: kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp +Subject: Re: Writing PIC version of __udivsi3_i4? (was: Re: "make tests" fails + with "libc.so: text relocations used" in glibc-2.3.2 for sh4) +In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:55:54 -0700" + <3F28A15A.5010400@kegel.com> +References: <3F28A15A.5010400@kegel.com> +Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 21:47:38 +0900 +From: kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> + +Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote: +>> I'll give binutils-2.14.90.0.5 a shot, then. +> +> No joy - same problem. Guess I'll take this up on binutils and/or libc-alpha. + +Please try the patch below, though it's a diff against the current +binutils CVS. + +Regards, + kaz +-- +diff -u3p ORIG/src/bfd/elf32-sh.c LOCAL/src/bfd/elf32-sh.c +--- src/bfd/elf32-sh.c.old Fri Jul 25 14:46:58 2003 ++++ src/bfd/elf32-sh.c Thu Jul 31 21:09:38 2003 +@@ -6497,8 +6497,10 @@ sh_elf_check_relocs (bfd *abfd, struct b + sreloc, 2)) + return FALSE; + } ++#if 0 + if (sec->flags & SEC_READONLY) + info->flags |= DF_TEXTREL; ++#endif + elf_section_data (sec)->sreloc = sreloc; + } + + + |