Backport patches to glibc 2.14+

... fix building on ARM.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Neyman <stilor@att.net>

1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/patches/glibc/2.16.0/106-dl-open-array-bounds.patch b/patches/glibc/2.16.0/106-dl-open-array-bounds.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a8efe9a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/patches/glibc/2.16.0/106-dl-open-array-bounds.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+commit 328c44c3670ebf6c1bd790acddce65a12998cd6c
+Author: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
+Date:   Fri Apr 17 12:11:58 2015 -0700
+
+    Fuller check for invalid NSID in _dl_open.
+
+diff --git a/elf/dl-open.c b/elf/dl-open.c
+index 0dbe07f..2d0e082 100644
+--- a/elf/dl-open.c
++++ b/elf/dl-open.c
+@@ -619,8 +619,14 @@ no more namespaces available for dlmopen()"));
+   /* Never allow loading a DSO in a namespace which is empty.  Such
+      direct placements is only causing problems.  Also don't allow
+      loading into a namespace used for auditing.  */
+-  else if (__builtin_expect (nsid != LM_ID_BASE && nsid != __LM_ID_CALLER, 0)
+-	   && (GL(dl_ns)[nsid]._ns_nloaded == 0
++  else if (__glibc_unlikely (nsid != LM_ID_BASE && nsid != __LM_ID_CALLER)
++	   && (__glibc_unlikely (nsid < 0 || nsid >= GL(dl_nns))
++	       /* This prevents the [NSID] index expressions from being
++		  evaluated, so the compiler won't think that we are
++		  accessing an invalid index here in the !SHARED case where
++		  DL_NNS is 1 and so any NSID != 0 is invalid.  */
++	       || DL_NNS == 1
++	       || GL(dl_ns)[nsid]._ns_nloaded == 0
+ 	       || GL(dl_ns)[nsid]._ns_loaded->l_auditing))
+     _dl_signal_error (EINVAL, file, NULL,
+ 		      N_("invalid target namespace in dlmopen()"));