--- /dev/null	Sat Dec 14 13:56:51 2002

+++ gcc-3.3.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr11736-1.c	Sun Sep 14 14:26:33 2003

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@

+/* PR optimization/11736

+ * Reporter: marcus@mc.pp.se

+ * Summary:  Stackpointer messed up on SuperH

+ * Keywords: wrong-code

+ * Description:

+ * When a function with 5 arguments is called in both branches of a

+ * conditional, and only the last argument differs, the code to push that

+ * last argument on the stack gets confused. 

+ * Space for the fifth argument is reserved on the stack by the

+ * instruction I have marked as "A".  However, if the else-branch is

+ * taken the stackpointer is decremented _again_ at "B".  This

+ * decrementation is never restored, and it is only due to the

+ * restoration of r15 from r14 that the function works at all.  With

+ * -fomit-frame-pointer it will crash.

+ *

+ * Testcase tweaked by dank@kegel.com

+ * Not marked as xfail since it's a regression from hardhat 2.0 gcc-2.97 

+ * and dodes gcc-3.0.2

+ */

+

+/* { dg-do run } */

+/* { dg-options "-O1 -fomit-frame-pointer" } */

+

+int expected_e;

+

+void bar(int a, int b, int c, int d, int e)

+{

+	if (e != expected_e)

+		abort();

+}

+

+void foo(int a)

+{

+	if (a)

+		bar(0, 0, 0, 0, 1);

+	else

+		bar(0, 0, 0, 0, 0);	/* stack pointer decremented extra time here, causing segfault */

+}

+

+int main(int argc, char **argv)

+{

+	for (expected_e = 0; expected_e < 2; expected_e++)

+		foo(expected_e);

+	return 0;

+}