1.1 --- a/patches/gcc/3.3.1/pr10412-1-test.patch	Tue Aug 14 19:32:22 2007 +0000
     1.2 +++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
     1.3 @@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
     1.4 ---- /dev/null	Sat Dec 14 13:56:51 2002
     1.5 -+++ gcc-3.3.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr10412-1.c	Sun Sep 14 16:15:21 2003
     1.6 -@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
     1.7 -+/* PR target/10412
     1.8 -+ * Reporter: shrinivasa@kpitcummins.com 
     1.9 -+ * Summary: Renesas SH - Incorrect code generation
    1.10 -+ * Description:
    1.11 -+ * When following code is compiled  with
    1.12 -+ * sh-elf-gcc  -S -mhitachi -m2 -O2 bug1.c
    1.13 -+ * generates an incorrect code.
    1.14 -+ *
    1.15 -+ * Testcase tweaked by dank@kegel.com
    1.16 -+ * Problem only happens with -mhitachi -m2.  Not sure if I can give those
    1.17 -+ * options for all sh targets.  They work on sh4, though.
    1.18 -+ * Not marked as xfail as it's a regression relative to hardhat 2.0 gcc-2.97.
    1.19 -+*/
    1.20 -+/* { dg-do run } */
    1.21 -+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
    1.22 -+int global_val;
    1.23 -+
    1.24 -+int func0(int x)
    1.25 -+{
    1.26 -+	global_val += x;
    1.27 -+	return (x != 99);
    1.28 -+}
    1.29 -+
    1.30 -+int func1(unsigned long addr)
    1.31 -+{
    1.32 -+	int err;
    1.33 -+
    1.34 -+	err = func0(addr);
    1.35 -+	if (err)
    1.36 -+		return (err);
    1.37 -+
    1.38 -+	err = func0(addr * 7);	/* address of func0 is lost during multiplication -> probable SIGSEGV */
    1.39 -+	return (err);
    1.40 -+}
    1.41 -+
    1.42 -+int main(int argc, char **argv)
    1.43 -+{
    1.44 -+	global_val = 0;
    1.45 -+	global_val += func1(99);
    1.46 -+	if (global_val != 99 * 8 + 1)
    1.47 -+		abort();
    1.48 -+	return 0;
    1.49 -+}