1.1 --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
1.2 +++ b/patches/binutils/2.22/120-sh-conf.patch Wed Dec 14 19:57:47 2011 +0100
1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
1.4 +r10231 | lethal | 2005-05-02 09:58:00 -0400 (Mon, 02 May 2005) | 13 lines
1.5 +
1.6 +Likewise, binutils has no idea about any of these new targets either, so we
1.7 +fix that up too.. now we're able to actually build a real toolchain for
1.8 +sh2a_nofpu- and other more ineptly named toolchains (and yes, there are more
1.9 +inept targets than that one, really. Go look, I promise).
1.10 +
1.11 +diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/configure binutils-2.22/configure
1.12 +--- binutils-2.22.orig/configure 2011-08-14 14:28:15.000000000 +0200
1.13 ++++ binutils-2.22/configure 2011-12-14 19:49:40.284777434 +0100
1.14 +@@ -3570,7 +3570,7 @@
1.15 + mips*-*-*)
1.16 + noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gprof"
1.17 + ;;
1.18 +- sh-*-* | sh64-*-*)
1.19 ++ sh*-*-* | sh64-*-*)
1.20 + case "${target}" in
1.21 + sh*-*-elf)
1.22 + ;;
1.23 +diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/configure.ac binutils-2.22/configure.ac
1.24 +--- binutils-2.22.orig/configure.ac 2011-11-21 12:58:27.000000000 +0100
1.25 ++++ binutils-2.22/configure.ac 2011-12-14 19:49:40.316777436 +0100
1.26 +@@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@
1.27 + mips*-*-*)
1.28 + noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gprof"
1.29 + ;;
1.30 +- sh-*-* | sh64-*-*)
1.31 ++ sh*-*-* | sh64-*-*)
1.32 + case "${target}" in
1.33 + sh*-*-elf)
1.34 + ;;
2.1 --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
2.2 +++ b/patches/binutils/2.22/300-001_ld_makefile_patch.patch Wed Dec 14 19:57:47 2011 +0100
2.3 @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
2.4 +diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/ld/Makefile.am binutils-2.22/ld/Makefile.am
2.5 +--- binutils-2.22.orig/ld/Makefile.am 2011-07-22 22:22:37.000000000 +0200
2.6 ++++ binutils-2.22/ld/Makefile.am 2011-12-14 19:50:25.760779164 +0100
2.7 +@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
2.8 + # We put the scripts in the directory $(scriptdir)/ldscripts.
2.9 + # We can't put the scripts in $(datadir) because the SEARCH_DIR
2.10 + # directives need to be different for native and cross linkers.
2.11 +-scriptdir = $(tooldir)/lib
2.12 ++scriptdir = $(libdir)
2.13 +
2.14 + EMUL = @EMUL@
2.15 + EMULATION_OFILES = @EMULATION_OFILES@
2.16 +diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/ld/Makefile.in binutils-2.22/ld/Makefile.in
2.17 +--- binutils-2.22.orig/ld/Makefile.in 2011-07-22 22:22:37.000000000 +0200
2.18 ++++ binutils-2.22/ld/Makefile.in 2011-12-14 19:50:25.784779163 +0100
2.19 +@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@
2.20 + # We put the scripts in the directory $(scriptdir)/ldscripts.
2.21 + # We can't put the scripts in $(datadir) because the SEARCH_DIR
2.22 + # directives need to be different for native and cross linkers.
2.23 +-scriptdir = $(tooldir)/lib
2.24 ++scriptdir = $(libdir)
2.25 + BASEDIR = $(srcdir)/..
2.26 + BFDDIR = $(BASEDIR)/bfd
2.27 + INCDIR = $(BASEDIR)/include
3.1 --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
3.2 +++ b/patches/binutils/2.22/300-012_check_ldrunpath_length.patch Wed Dec 14 19:57:47 2011 +0100
3.3 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
3.4 +diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.22/ld/emultempl/elf32.em
3.5 +--- binutils-2.22.orig/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2011-11-21 10:29:39.000000000 +0100
3.6 ++++ binutils-2.22/ld/emultempl/elf32.em 2011-12-14 19:52:12.880783238 +0100
3.7 +@@ -1273,6 +1273,8 @@
3.8 + && command_line.rpath == NULL)
3.9 + {
3.10 + lib_path = (const char *) getenv ("LD_RUN_PATH");
3.11 ++ if ((lib_path) && (strlen (lib_path) == 0))
3.12 ++ lib_path = NULL;
3.13 + if (gld${EMULATION_NAME}_search_needed (lib_path, &n,
3.14 + force))
3.15 + break;
3.16 +@@ -1500,6 +1502,8 @@
3.17 + rpath = command_line.rpath;
3.18 + if (rpath == NULL)
3.19 + rpath = (const char *) getenv ("LD_RUN_PATH");
3.20 ++ if ((rpath) && (strlen (rpath) == 0))
3.21 ++ rpath = NULL;
3.22 +
3.23 + for (abfd = link_info.input_bfds; abfd; abfd = abfd->link_next)
3.24 + if (bfd_get_flavour (abfd) == bfd_target_elf_flavour)
4.1 --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
4.2 +++ b/patches/binutils/2.22/999-ppc-textrels.patch Wed Dec 14 19:57:47 2011 +0100
4.3 @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
4.4 +http://bugs.gentoo.org/392645
4.5 +http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13470
4.6 +
4.7 +2011-12-03 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
4.8 +
4.9 + PR ld/13470
4.10 + * elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Revert substantive
4.11 + change in 2011-07-01 commit. Comment.
4.12 + * elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Likewise.
4.13 +
4.14 +diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf32-ppc.c binutils-2.22/bfd/elf32-ppc.c
4.15 +--- binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf32-ppc.c 2011-11-21 10:29:21.000000000 +0100
4.16 ++++ binutils-2.22/bfd/elf32-ppc.c 2011-12-14 19:52:43.308784395 +0100
4.17 +@@ -2987,10 +2987,6 @@
4.18 + edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
4.19 + edir->elf.pointer_equality_needed |= eind->elf.pointer_equality_needed;
4.20 +
4.21 +- /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. */
4.22 +- if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
4.23 +- return;
4.24 +-
4.25 + if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
4.26 + {
4.27 + if (edir->dyn_relocs != NULL)
4.28 +@@ -3022,6 +3018,16 @@
4.29 + eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
4.30 + }
4.31 +
4.32 ++ /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
4.33 ++ You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over; After all,
4.34 ++ both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
4.35 ++ moving reloc accounting around. However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS
4.36 ++ code in ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
4.37 ++ dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
4.38 ++ DIR sym here. */
4.39 ++ if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
4.40 ++ return;
4.41 ++
4.42 + /* Copy over the GOT refcount entries that we may have already seen to
4.43 + the symbol which just became indirect. */
4.44 + edir->elf.got.refcount += eind->elf.got.refcount;
4.45 +diff -durN binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf64-ppc.c binutils-2.22/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
4.46 +--- binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf64-ppc.c 2011-11-21 10:29:24.000000000 +0100
4.47 ++++ binutils-2.22/bfd/elf64-ppc.c 2011-12-14 19:52:43.336784395 +0100
4.48 +@@ -4435,10 +4435,6 @@
4.49 + edir->elf.ref_regular_nonweak |= eind->elf.ref_regular_nonweak;
4.50 + edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
4.51 +
4.52 +- /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. */
4.53 +- if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
4.54 +- return;
4.55 +-
4.56 + /* Copy over any dynamic relocs we may have on the indirect sym. */
4.57 + if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
4.58 + {
4.59 +@@ -4471,6 +4467,16 @@
4.60 + eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
4.61 + }
4.62 +
4.63 ++ /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
4.64 ++ You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over; After all,
4.65 ++ both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
4.66 ++ moving reloc accounting around. However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS
4.67 ++ code in ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
4.68 ++ dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
4.69 ++ DIR sym here. */
4.70 ++ if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
4.71 ++ return;
4.72 ++
4.73 + /* Copy over got entries that we may have already seen to the
4.74 + symbol which just became indirect. */
4.75 + if (eind->elf.got.glist != NULL)